<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:53:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sutcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sutcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Andres, it certainly is possible to put thread features on a part and have them in the Synchronous environment.

Since you are a subscriber to our Synchronous Technology site - I’ll be more than happy to e-mail you details on how to do this.
Best regards
Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andres, it certainly is possible to put thread features on a part and have them in the Synchronous environment.</p>
<p>Since you are a subscriber to our Synchronous Technology site &#8211; I’ll be more than happy to e-mail you details on how to do this.<br />
Best regards<br />
Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres Quiceno</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Quiceno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-30</guid>
		<description>hi
I`m writing again, `cause I have ST now, since i&#039;m customer
but I have a little problem with thread features.
In TRADITIONAL TEMPLATE  i have it, but in synchronous Does not exist,
so i ask: how can i change a part that was made in ST to traditional part?
or how can I do a blend of some comands from traditional template to st template?
please help me 
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
I`m writing again, `cause I have ST now, since i&#8217;m customer<br />
but I have a little problem with thread features.<br />
In TRADITIONAL TEMPLATE  i have it, but in synchronous Does not exist,<br />
so i ask: how can i change a part that was made in ST to traditional part?<br />
or how can I do a blend of some comands from traditional template to st template?<br />
please help me<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sutcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sutcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hi Andres, there is no need to worry. Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology still allows you to do all the things you can at the moment in V20. We still have Family of Part and Family of Assemblies functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andres, there is no need to worry. Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology still allows you to do all the things you can at the moment in V20. We still have Family of Part and Family of Assemblies functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres Quiceno</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Quiceno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hello
About that, I`m worry `cause I work lot with family parts and family of asemblies, and In haven`t seen this icon on the edge bar, wath`s happening with that?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
About that, I`m worry `cause I work lot with family parts and family of asemblies, and In haven`t seen this icon on the edge bar, wath`s happening with that?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sutcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sutcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The first thing I would say is that there is no need to worry. This version of Solid Edge still has all the great features and capabilities that you already know so well. It&#039;s just that it also has Synchronous Technology too. 

So what this means is that you can easily carry on working the way you do at the moment - using surfacing, adjustable parts, goal seeking and so on. Then gradually start using Synchronous methods on new and existing data. Solid Edge will be quite happy to mix and match both Synchronous and Traditional data on the same assembly. It is extremely easy to use and really comes into its own when modifying native and imported data. The best advice I could give is that you for when you start using Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology (specifically when working on a synchronous part) is to just open your mind and do not try and force it to work the way you do already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing I would say is that there is no need to worry. This version of Solid Edge still has all the great features and capabilities that you already know so well. It&#8217;s just that it also has Synchronous Technology too. </p>
<p>So what this means is that you can easily carry on working the way you do at the moment &#8211; using surfacing, adjustable parts, goal seeking and so on. Then gradually start using Synchronous methods on new and existing data. Solid Edge will be quite happy to mix and match both Synchronous and Traditional data on the same assembly. It is extremely easy to use and really comes into its own when modifying native and imported data. The best advice I could give is that you for when you start using Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology (specifically when working on a synchronous part) is to just open your mind and do not try and force it to work the way you do already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josue</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>josue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-10</guid>
		<description>i´m worry because this technology show us that the way of modeling have to change very quicly, how we ussually model have to be more fast, and we have to change our barin structure to be more flexible. next i have a few questions

How SE with ST will afect the surface modeling?

if i delete a parent feature the child will be a &quot;wrong profile&quot;? or automaticly the child feature will be constrain by other faces of the solid model?

how SE with ST impacts on adjustable parts?. do we will be able to make animations with springs for example?

how SE with ST could be used with &quot;goal seeking&quot; on assembly to fit between parts?

thanks to ingenea to make this page. and, sorry for my english</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i´m worry because this technology show us that the way of modeling have to change very quicly, how we ussually model have to be more fast, and we have to change our barin structure to be more flexible. next i have a few questions</p>
<p>How SE with ST will afect the surface modeling?</p>
<p>if i delete a parent feature the child will be a &#8220;wrong profile&#8221;? or automaticly the child feature will be constrain by other faces of the solid model?</p>
<p>how SE with ST impacts on adjustable parts?. do we will be able to make animations with springs for example?</p>
<p>how SE with ST could be used with &#8220;goal seeking&#8221; on assembly to fit between parts?</p>
<p>thanks to ingenea to make this page. and, sorry for my english</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sutcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sutcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hi Wim, with regards to the MS Office style ribbon bar, yes Siemens have licensed the code and formatting for this directly from Microsoft so whilst the ribbon remains fixed, it is possible to customise the quick access bar.
Also the floating toolbar appears when you are interacting with the geometry. It contains appropriate commands which adapt to what you select and what you are trying to do. It is not at all like Microstation (believe me I speak from experience here) and does not get in the way of what you are trying to do. In fact it enhances the way you work as it negates having to go and pick commands from the normal menus.
Hope that helps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wim, with regards to the MS Office style ribbon bar, yes Siemens have licensed the code and formatting for this directly from Microsoft so whilst the ribbon remains fixed, it is possible to customise the quick access bar.<br />
Also the floating toolbar appears when you are interacting with the geometry. It contains appropriate commands which adapt to what you select and what you are trying to do. It is not at all like Microstation (believe me I speak from experience here) and does not get in the way of what you are trying to do. In fact it enhances the way you work as it negates having to go and pick commands from the normal menus.<br />
Hope that helps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wim Dednam</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Wim Dednam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I would appreciate if you could expand on the new MS Office-like &quot;Ribbon&quot; interface (Toolbars), i.e. are they also locked so that we cannot customize it? This end-user &quot;lock-out&quot; was one of the most bone-headed decisions made by the MS Office developer team!
I also noticed a floating Toolbar on the screenshot above, does this mean we will be irritated by lots of floating Toolbars obscuring &amp; cluttering the screen with which we want to interact with? Reminds me of my MicroStation user-interface of a decade ago…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would appreciate if you could expand on the new MS Office-like &#8220;Ribbon&#8221; interface (Toolbars), i.e. are they also locked so that we cannot customize it? This end-user &#8220;lock-out&#8221; was one of the most bone-headed decisions made by the MS Office developer team!<br />
I also noticed a floating Toolbar on the screenshot above, does this mean we will be irritated by lots of floating Toolbars obscuring &amp; cluttering the screen with which we want to interact with? Reminds me of my MicroStation user-interface of a decade ago…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sutcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sutcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Phil. That is exactly the sort of question we hope to answer over the comming weeks on this site.
Keep checking back for new posts and video content showing some useful examples on all aspects of Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Phil. That is exactly the sort of question we hope to answer over the comming weeks on this site.<br />
Keep checking back for new posts and video content showing some useful examples on all aspects of Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/32/solid-edge-with-synchronous-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synchronoustechnology.net/blog/?p=32#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Would love to see how all assembly inter-part functions can work in harmony with ST in praticle assemblies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to see how all assembly inter-part functions can work in harmony with ST in praticle assemblies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

